Sightful Invest
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Stock
Top Posts
US-backed Gaza aid group launches bold new system...
Biden doctor pleads the Fifth in speedy House...
Watchdog backs Rubio’s sanctions on UN official over...
Trump taps Sean Duffy to serve as interim...
Trump cautioned Putin he would ‘bomb the s—‘...
I worked for the most successful third party...
‘Gut check time’: Dissent among Senate GOP ranks...
New book reveals what Obama and ‘conqueror’ Trump...
Trump had very unexpected convo with Obama at...
10 reasons the DOJ and FBI face backlash...
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Stock

Sightful Invest

Politics

‘Election interference’: Trump lawyers call for delayed sentencing in Bragg case

by admin August 16, 2024
August 16, 2024
‘Election interference’: Trump lawyers call for delayed sentencing in Bragg case

Lawyers for former President Trump are requesting his sentencing hearing in New York v. Trump be delayed until after the November presidential election, citing ‘naked election-interference objectives.’ 

Trump was found guilty in an unprecedented criminal trial on all counts of falsifying business records in the first degree, following a six-week trial stemming from Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s investigation.

Trump has moved to overturn his criminal conviction in the Manhattan case after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a former president has substantial immunity for official acts committed while in office. 

His initial sentencing was set for July 11 — just days before the Republican National Convention, where he was set to be formally nominated as the 2024 GOP presidential nominee, but Judge Juan Merchan agreed to delay that until Sept. 18. 

Trump attorney Todd Blanche on Thursday moved to further delay that sentencing hearing. 

‘The Court should adjourn any sentencing in this case, though one should not be necessary because dismissal and vacatur of the jury’s verdicts are required based on Presidential immunity, until after the 2024 Presidential election,’ Blanche wrote in a letter to Merchan. 

Blanche argued that the case ‘should be dismissed’ and pointed to the fact that Vice President Kamala Harris, in her capacity as the Democratic presidential nominee, and her running mate, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, in his capacity as the Democratic vice presidential nominee, ‘wrongly referred to this case in a public speech.’ 

Blanche also pointed to Merchan’s daughter’s work at Authentic Campaigns, which represents top Democratic candidates. 

‘Sentencing is currently scheduled to occur after the commencement of early voting in the Presidential election,’ Blanche wrote. ‘By adjourning sentencing until after the election — which is of paramount importance to the entire nation, including tens of millions of people who do not share the views of Authentic, its executives, and its clients — the Court would reduce, even if not eliminate, issues regarding the integrity of any future proceedings.’ 

Blanche stressed that there is no need ‘to rush.’ 

‘Setting aside naked election-interference objectives, there is no valid countervailing reason for the Court to keep the current sentencing date on the calendar,’ Blanche wrote. ‘There is no basis for continuing to rush.’ 

He added, ‘Accordingly, we respectfully request that any sentencing, if one is needed, be adjourned until after the Presidential election.’ 

In his arguments for dismissal, Blanche argued that Bragg offered official acts evidence during the six-week-long unprecedented criminal trial. Blanche said that included official White House communications with staffers like Hope Hicks, Madeleine Westerhout and others. 

The Supreme Court ruled in Trump v. United States that a former president has substantial immunity from prosecution for official acts in office but not for unofficial acts. The high court said Trump is immune from criminal prosecution for ‘official acts’ but left it to the lower court to determine exactly where the line between official and unofficial is.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

previous post
JD Vance agrees to debate Tim Walz on Oct. 1
next post
TikTok and fast-food rivalry fuel Chili’s sales as parent Brinker says turnaround is taking hold

You may also like

Vance needs to fix ‘off-putting’ comments or Trump...

August 6, 2024

Trump says he respects Supreme Court’s decision to...

January 10, 2025

Dozens of prominent veterans sign onto letter supporting...

December 7, 2024

3 numbers that explain November election results –...

December 6, 2024

Conservatives flip script on Senate Dems pushing identical...

March 5, 2025

Trump picks Scott Turner as secretary for Department...

November 23, 2024

Who could run to replace Stefanik in the...

November 12, 2024

2028 Watch: Here are the Democrats who may...

December 30, 2024

Trump’s Gaza relocation proposal sparks heated debate among...

February 11, 2025

Trump trumps Biden as president-elect overshadows White House...

December 5, 2024

Recent Posts

  • US-backed Gaza aid group launches bold new system to deliver food directly to families
  • Biden doctor pleads the Fifth in speedy House closed-door interview
  • Watchdog backs Rubio’s sanctions on UN official over ‘shameful efforts’ targeting US, Israel
  • Trump taps Sean Duffy to serve as interim NASA chief
  • Trump cautioned Putin he would ‘bomb the s—‘ out of Moscow if Russia invaded Ukraine, new book claims

    Become a VIP member by signing up for our newsletter. Enjoy exclusive content, early access to sales, and special offers just for you! As a VIP, you'll receive personalized updates, loyalty rewards, and invitations to private events. Elevate your experience and join our exclusive community today!


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Categories

    • Business (819)
    • Investing (2,497)
    • Politics (3,095)
    • Stock (4)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: sightfulinvest.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2024 Sightful Invest. All Rights Reserved.