Sightful Invest
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Stock
Top Posts
US-backed Gaza aid group launches bold new system...
Biden doctor pleads the Fifth in speedy House...
Watchdog backs Rubio’s sanctions on UN official over...
Trump taps Sean Duffy to serve as interim...
Trump cautioned Putin he would ‘bomb the s—‘...
I worked for the most successful third party...
‘Gut check time’: Dissent among Senate GOP ranks...
New book reveals what Obama and ‘conqueror’ Trump...
Trump had very unexpected convo with Obama at...
10 reasons the DOJ and FBI face backlash...
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Stock

Sightful Invest

Politics

Biden’s Meta ‘censorship’ revelations ‘vindicated’ Alito dissent in RFK Jr case

by admin January 17, 2025
January 17, 2025
Biden’s Meta ‘censorship’ revelations ‘vindicated’ Alito dissent in RFK Jr case

The announcement by Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg that Facebook and Instagram would end their work with third-party fact-checkers and ease certain content restrictions was praised by some conservative activists, who cheered it as a ‘vindication’ for Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, who dissented from the rest of the court in late 2023 in a case involving content regulation that included a post by the former presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

The case centered on whether Meta was acting outside its scope when its platform, Facebook, temporarily removed a 30-minute video posted by Kennedy, which included vaccine misinformation and other false claims about COVID-19. The Supreme Court majority declined to take up the case without explanation, but Alito disagreed, writing as the sole dissenter for the court.

Alito, a George W. Bush appointee, blasted the video’s removal in a scathing dissent, saying that the platform had censored a type of political speech in its attempts to crack down on misinformation, and could therefore be seen as acting on behalf of the U.S. government and possibly causing what he described as ‘irreparable’ harm.

‘Our democratic form of government is undermined if government officials prevent a candidate for high office from communicating with voters, and such efforts are especially dangerous when the officials engaging in such conduct are answerable to a rival candidate,’ Alito said in the dissent. 

‘I would allow him to intervene to ensure that we can reach the merits of respondents’ claims and to prevent the irreparable loss of his First Amendment rights,’ he added.

‘Because Mr. Kennedy’s arguments on the merits are essentially the same as respondents’, allowing intervention would not significantly affect petitioners’ burden with regard to that issue,’ Alito wrote. ‘But the denial of intervention is likely to prevent Mr. Kennedy from vindicating the rights he claims until the spring of 2024 and perhaps as late as June of that year. And by that time, several months of the presidential campaign will have passed.’ 

Zuckerberg announced earlier this month that Meta would end its previous content restrictions used on Facebook and Instagram — which were put into place after the 2016 elections — acknowledging in a video posted on social media that they had ‘gone too far’ and allowed for too much political bias from outside fact-checkers.

‘We’ve reached a point where it’s just too many mistakes and too much censorship,’ Zuckerberg said in the announcement.

‘The recent elections also feel like a cultural tipping point toward once again prioritizing speech. So we are going to get back to our roots, focus on reducing mistakes, simplifying our policies, and restoring free expression on our platforms.’

Meta will now replace that system with a ‘Community Notes’-style program, similar to the approach taken by social media platform X, he said. X is owned by Elon Musk, the co-director of the planned Department of Government Efficiency.

That news was praised by Mollie Hemingway, the editor-in-chief of The Federalist, who noted on X that the decision from Zuckerberg ‘vindicated’ Alito’s dissent. ‘Kind of crazy how Zuck was like ‘what they did had to be illegal’ but majority on Court was like ‘I mean, who can know?” Hemingway said of the Supreme Court’s decision not to take up the case.

Related Topics

  • Politics
  • Technology
  • Supreme Court
  • Big Tech Backlash
This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

previous post
‘Safer, stronger, and freer’: Securing the border set to feature large in Noem’s opening remarks to Senate
next post
While Trump, Biden claim credit for Israel-Hamas cease-fire, some Republicans call it a ‘bad deal’

You may also like

Why Trump’s push for frigid Greenland is about...

March 29, 2025

GOP lawmaker confronted at town hall says protesters’...

March 20, 2025

Trump says Ric Grenell will be ‘high up’...

December 12, 2024

Celebrities have ‘incredibly powerful’ ability to influence election:...

August 15, 2024

With Trump’s backing Israel pushes deeper into Gaza...

April 13, 2025

Key Trump agency facing ‘unprecedented backlog’ inherited from...

April 15, 2025

Elon Musk becomes DNC’s target in high-stakes Wisconsin...

March 28, 2025

White House releases medical report on VP Kamala...

October 12, 2024

Vladimir Putin meets with Iranian President Pezeshkian to...

October 12, 2024

Panama eliminates charge fees for US government vessels...

February 6, 2025

Recent Posts

  • US-backed Gaza aid group launches bold new system to deliver food directly to families
  • Biden doctor pleads the Fifth in speedy House closed-door interview
  • Watchdog backs Rubio’s sanctions on UN official over ‘shameful efforts’ targeting US, Israel
  • Trump taps Sean Duffy to serve as interim NASA chief
  • Trump cautioned Putin he would ‘bomb the s—‘ out of Moscow if Russia invaded Ukraine, new book claims

    Become a VIP member by signing up for our newsletter. Enjoy exclusive content, early access to sales, and special offers just for you! As a VIP, you'll receive personalized updates, loyalty rewards, and invitations to private events. Elevate your experience and join our exclusive community today!


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Categories

    • Business (819)
    • Investing (2,497)
    • Politics (3,095)
    • Stock (4)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: sightfulinvest.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2024 Sightful Invest. All Rights Reserved.