Sightful Invest
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Stock
Top Posts
Comey to be arraigned in federal court after...
Comey pleads not guilty in court after indictment...
Houthi rebels test US ceasefire with deadly strike...
Kushner joins Witkoff for Gaza ceasefire talks as...
Cuomo rips Mamdani’s freebie ‘fantasy,’ says AOC proved...
White House escalates shutdown consequences as Democrats show...
Moderate Dem undercuts Jeffries on ObamaCare compromise as...
MIKE DAVIS: The Supreme Court betrayed again —...
Senate Democrats defy White House warnings, again block...
Greta Thunberg slammed for using image of starved...
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Stock

Sightful Invest

Politics

Axed government watchdog says Trump has right to fire him

by admin March 8, 2025
March 8, 2025
Axed government watchdog says Trump has right to fire him

A government watchdog fired by President Donald Trump in January has filed a legal brief arguing that Trump is well within his executive powers to fire him and the 16 other U.S. inspectors general ousted just four days into his second term.  

Eric Soskin, the former inspector general for the U.S. Department of Transportation, was appointed by Trump during his first presidential term. He was then fired just four days after Trump returned to the Oval Office, Jeff Beelaert, an attorney for Givens Pursley and a former Department of Justice official, told Fox News in an interview.

‘Eric was one of the fired inspectors general, and disagreed with his former IG colleagues. He wanted to make that clear in filing a brief,’ Beelaert said. 

Trump moved shortly after his inauguration to purge the government watchdogs from across 17 government agencies, prompting intense backlash, criticism and questions over the legality of the personnel decisions. 

The move prompted a lawsuit from eight of the ousted watchdogs, who asked the presiding judge in the case, U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes, to declare their firings illegal and to restore their agency positions.

These remedies are considered a long shot, and are unlikely to succeed next week when the plaintiffs appear in D.C. court for their next hearing. Even so, Soskin disagreed so strongly with their rationale that he not only declined to join their lawsuit, but also had lawyers file an amicus brief on his behalf supporting the administration’s ability to terminate his role.

Beelaert helped author that amicus brief on Soskin’s behalf, which outlined primary reasons that Trump does have the power to make these personnel decisions, under Article II of the Constitution, Supreme Court precedent and updates to federal policy.

The brief invokes the IGs ‘mistaken’ reliance on a 1930s-era precedent, Humphrey’s Executor, which protects agency firings in certain cases, and requires a 30-day notice period for any personnel decisions. Soskin’s lawyers argue that the reliance on this case is misguided and that the precedent applies solely to members of ‘multi-member, expert, balanced commissions’ that largely report to Congress, and are not at issue here.

‘Supreme Court precedent over the last five, ten years has almost all but rejected that idea that Congress can impose restrictions on the president’s removal authority,’ Beelaert said.

Other critics noted that Trump failed to give Congress a 30-day notice period before he terminated the government watchdogs — a formality but something that Trump supporters note is no longer required under the law.

In 2022, Congress updated its Inspector General Act of 1978, which formerly required a president to communicate to Congress any ‘reasons’ for terminations 30 days before any decision was made. That notice provision was amended in 2022 to require only a ‘substantive rationale, including detailed and case-specific reasons’ for terminations.

The White House Director of Presidential Personnel has claimed that the firings are in line with that requirement, which were a reflection of ‘changing priorities’ from within the administration. 

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, suggested earlier this year that Congress should be given more information as to the reasons for the firings, though more recently he has declined to elaborate on the matter.

Plaintiffs challenging the firings are likely to face a tough time making their case next week in federal court.

U.S. District Judge Reyes, the presiding judge in the case, did not appear moved by the plaintiffs’ bid for emergency relief.

She declined to grant their earlier request for a temporary restraining order — a tough legal test that requires plaintiffs to prove ‘irreparable’ and immediate harm as a result of the actions — and told both parties during the hearing that, barring new or revelatory information, she is not inclined to rule in favor of plaintiffs at the larger preliminary injunction hearing scheduled for March 11.

‘At the end of the day, this drives home the idea that elections matter,’ Beelaert said. 

‘And of all the times that the president should have the removal of authority, it’s the start of the administration’ that should be most important, he said, noting that this is true for both political parties.

‘It doesn’t matter who serves in the White House. I think that any president, whether it’s President Trump, President Biden — it doesn’t matter,’ Beelaert said. ‘The president should be allowed to pick who is going to serve in his administration. And to me, that’s a bit lost in this debate. ‘

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

previous post
Trump announces US ambassador nominations that include mayor of Michigan city
next post
Hospitals warned they must protect children from chemical and surgical mutilation: HHS agency memo

You may also like

Israel, British Jews slam UK’s ‘hypocritical’ decision to...

September 6, 2024

House Dems sue FEC accusing GOP of exploiting...

October 19, 2024

Rashida Tlaib refuses to endorse Kamala Harris as...

November 3, 2024

‘Growing heat’: Sotomayor spars with Alito during LGBTQ...

April 23, 2025

Regime-dominated Venezuelan Supreme Court rules Maduro election winner...

August 23, 2024

Trump kicks off whirlwind week marking his 100th...

April 28, 2025

Syrian rights activist and cousin of Assad tears...

March 15, 2025

Blagojevich has new job working for ‘Bosnian Bear’...

April 3, 2025

‘Putin is pushing the limits’: Eastern allies warn...

September 27, 2025

Republicans shoot down House Dem’s bid to publicize...

December 6, 2024

Recent Posts

  • Comey to be arraigned in federal court after being indicted for alleged false statements, obstruction
  • Comey pleads not guilty in court after indictment on alleged false statements, obstruction
  • Houthi rebels test US ceasefire with deadly strike on cargo ship
  • Kushner joins Witkoff for Gaza ceasefire talks as Trump pushes peace plan: ‘Cautiously optimistic’
  • Cuomo rips Mamdani’s freebie ‘fantasy,’ says AOC proved socialism fails after killing NYC Amazon deal

    Sign up for our newsletter to receive the latest insights, updates, and exclusive content straight to your inbox! Whether it's industry news, expert advice, or inspiring stories, we bring you valuable information that you won't find anywhere else. Stay connected with us!


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Categories

    • Business (936)
    • Investing (3,147)
    • Politics (3,845)
    • Stock (4)
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: sightfulinvest.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 Sightful Invest. All Rights Reserved.