Sightful Invest
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Stock
Top Posts
Flashback: Top five wildest moments from Elon Musk’s...
Less than half of DOGE-terminated contracts can be...
Jill Biden should have to answer for ‘cover...
DOGE staffing shakeup as Elon Musk hangs up...
State Dept says DOGE’s changes will be permanent...
President Trump teases ‘last day, but not really’...
Trump denounces court’s ‘political’ tariff decision, calls on...
I’m a physician and I’m worried that our...
Inside the late-night drama that led to Trump’s...
Alleged attempt to impersonate White House chief of...
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Stock

Sightful Invest

Investing

Google’s Ad Tech Business Faces Uncertainty After Court Ruling

by admin April 18, 2025
April 18, 2025
Google’s Ad Tech Business Faces Uncertainty After Court Ruling

On April 17 (Thursday), Judge Leonie Brinkema of the US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia ruled against Google (NASDAQ:GOOGL) in the antitrust case concerning its advertising technology business, casting a shroud of uncertainty over the future of the tech giant’s online advertising business.

Brinkema will now need to determine what remedies to impose on Google to restore fair market competition. The plaintiffs sought to force Google to divest its Ad Manager, which includes the company’s publisher ad server and its ad exchange, to restore competition in the market. This outcome is far more likely following Judge Brinkema’s ruling.

This is a developing story happening alongside a similar case against Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:META), which is being sued by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) for allegedly monopolizing social media through its acquisition of Instagram in 2012 and WhatsApp in 2014.

This trial against Google began in September 2024, and the plaintiffs in the lawsuit comprise the Department of Justice (DOJ) and attorneys general from eight states.

The plaintiffs argued that Google’s dominance in ad tech allowed it to charge higher prices and take a larger share of ad sales. They accused Google of stifling competition by controlling the technology used to place ads on websites across the internet.

The ruling against Google marks a significant step in one of numerous anti-competitive cases brought against Google in the past few years, both in the US and internationally.

It follows an earlier ruling in August 2024 in which Google was found to have an illegal monopoly in the online search market in the US. That case will move into the remedies phase next week, with a court date of April 21, 2025.

“This is a game-changer,” wrote Connecticut Attorney General William Tong, one of the plaintiffs in both cases. “As Judge Brinkema writes in her decision, Google was in direct violation of the Sherman Act by dictating how digital ads are sold and the terms under which its rivals can compete.

‘With this victory in hand, we can hopefully work now towards restoring a fair, free, and competitive digital advertising marketplace. This decision is the first step in opening up competition so that Connecticut businesses and consumers will pay less for advertising – and therefore less for goods and services. We will no longer be under the thumb of a gigantic multinational conglomerate.”

US District Judge Amit Mehta, who ruled against Google in the August 2024 case, has considered imposing structural remedies that could involve forcing Google to divest its Chrome business, although Google has argued divestiture would hurt consumers. Instead, the company has suggested allowing browser companies to have multiple default agreements with various search engines.

Regulators have been digging into various aspects of Google’s business, including its advertising technology, search practices and mobile operating system.

In addition to the current case, Google is also facing scrutiny from antitrust regulators in Europe, the UK and other jurisdictions. The outcomes of these cases could have far-reaching implications for Google’s business model and the tech industry as a whole.

Today’s ruling signifies a major development in the ongoing scrutiny of Big Tech’s market dominance, which echoes efforts to dismantle AT&T’s (NYSE:T) phone monopoly in the 1980s. The eventual outcome of that case led to AT&T’s breakup into seven independent enterprises, which laid the groundwork for some of today’s major telecommunications and internet services providers, including Verizon (NYSE:VZ) and Lumen Technologies (NYSE:LUMN). It also gave cable companies like Comcast room to expand into internet services.

Whatever outcome Judge Brinkema decides, the ruling could reshape the online advertising landscape and have far-reaching implications for both the company and the broader tech industry.

Securities Disclosure: I, Meagen Seatter, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

Keep reading…Show less

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

previous post
US Capital Gains Tax Guide for Gold and Silver Investors
next post
Gold Price Hits New Record, Breaking US$3,300 for First Time

You may also like

NorthStar Gaming Changes Date of Q4 and Year-End...

April 25, 2025

Successful Completion of Placement to Accelerate Clinical Programs

March 4, 2025

Suki Secures US$70 Million to Drive AI-Assisted Healthcare...

October 16, 2024

Riverside Resources Receives Conditional TSX-V Approval for Spin-Out...

February 24, 2025

Van Eck Opposes Equinox Gold’s US$1.8 Billion Takeover...

March 20, 2025

World Copper Initiates Strategic Review Process and Engages...

November 20, 2024

Bold Ventures Announces PDAC 2025 Booth and Plans...

February 20, 2025

Nuclear Fuels Closes Private Placement with Newly Appointed...

October 21, 2024

Pan American to Buy MAG Silver in US$2.1...

May 13, 2025

Top 10 Gold Reserves by Country

November 22, 2024

Recent Posts

  • Flashback: Top five wildest moments from Elon Musk’s DOGE tenure as it comes to an end
  • Less than half of DOGE-terminated contracts can be publicly tracked, only about a quarter of grants: watchdog
  • Jill Biden should have to answer for ‘cover up’ of former president’s decline, White House says
  • DOGE staffing shakeup as Elon Musk hangs up his hat, White House confirms
  • State Dept says DOGE’s changes will be permanent amid Musk’s departure

    Become a VIP member by signing up for our newsletter. Enjoy exclusive content, early access to sales, and special offers just for you! As a VIP, you'll receive personalized updates, loyalty rewards, and invitations to private events. Elevate your experience and join our exclusive community today!


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Categories

    • Business (751)
    • Investing (2,211)
    • Politics (2,729)
    • Stock (4)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: sightfulinvest.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2024 Sightful Invest. All Rights Reserved.