Sightful Invest
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Stock
Top Posts
Reporter’s Notebook : A ‘letter’ to Zelenskyy about...
JFK’s granddaughter, Tatiana Schlossberg, reveals terminal cancer diagnosis...
Obama wanted shutdown pain to be felt by...
Trump admin disputes claim that Ukraine peace plan...
Trump orders Epstein files release, welcomes Mamdani, crown...
Vindman’s call to release Trump–MBS transcript reopens old...
EXCLUSIVE: FBI concludes Trump shooter Thomas Crooks acted...
House Republicans demand Trump admin deny Mamdani federal...
Graham says Trump wants to ‘move the bill’...
NY Democrat warns extremism on left, right is...
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Stock

Sightful Invest

Politics

As Musk exits DOGE, a look back at previous efforts to cut waste, fraud and abuse – and how they fared

by admin June 2, 2025
June 2, 2025
As Musk exits DOGE, a look back at previous efforts to cut waste, fraud and abuse – and how they fared

As Elon Musk steps away from his official role at the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), he joins a history of presidential administrations that have attempted to streamline government – with mixed results.

While former Presidents Thomas Jefferson, Andrew Jackson and Grover Cleveland all tried to downsize the judiciary, treasury and civil service, respectively, it wasn’t until the 20th century that the federal government grew into the bureaucratic behemoth it is that has drawn true DOGE-type attention.

Though often seen as the bigger spenders, some Democrats joined Republicans in the 1990s to shrink the size of government and make it more accountable to taxpayers.

‘We know big government does not have all the answers,’ former President Bill Clinton said during his 1996 State of the Union.

‘We know there’s not a program for every problem. We have worked to give the American people a smaller, less bureaucratic government in Washington – and we have to give the American people one that lives within its means.’

‘The era of big government is over,’ he said, in a phrase that had largely been considered the closest emulation of DOGE thought until Musk arrived on the scene.

Clinton also sought welfare reform and emphasized personal responsibility over dependency on the state.

The Arkansan also called for slashing the bureaucracy by 200,000 jobs and worked with then-House Speaker Newt Gingrich, R-Ga., to balance the federal budget.

President Donald Trump’s efforts to do the same have received a very different response from the left.

Clinton, working with congressional Republicans – while also frequently sparring with them – was able to reduce the federal workforce somewhat and establish a budget surplus but also failed to realize entitlement reform, something that more recent fiscal hawks have also struggled with.

Clinton won his 1992 upset as a centrist, after incumbent Republican George H.W. Bush was lambasted for reneging on his ‘Read my lips – no new taxes’ pledge, with a statistical boost from industrialist independent H. Ross Perot, who won the votes of many erstwhile Bush supporters.

Clinton and then-Vice President Al Gore established a National Performance Review (NPR) that drew some parallels to today’s DOGE, and cut the bureaucracy to 1960s levels.

Bill Clinton went on to win re-election over otherwise popular GOP stalwart Sen. Bob Dole, of Kansas, in 1996.

In 1980, actor-turned-California Gov. Ronald Reagan took the White House with promises similar to another celebrity-turned-politician who would do the same 36 years later.

The Gipper did not succeed in abolishing the Department of Education – created only a few years prior by President Jimmy Carter – something Trump has also sought.

But, he reinvigorated a new generation of conservatives who still praise him for slashing income taxes, seeking to ‘starve the beast’ via forced discretionary-spending cuts, and took on public-sector unions when he essentially won a dare against air traffic controllers who went on strike by firing them all and prohibiting their rehiring.

Reagan’s closest iteration of DOGE was the 1982 Grace Commission, studying cost-cutting and efficiency – and led by Maryland chemical executive J. Peter Grace along with dozens of ‘commissioners’ plucked from the private sector.

In the executive order creating the Grace Commission, it was tasked with examining ‘the entire federal government for areas of inefficiency, mismanagement and waste, and to recommend savings without raising taxes or cutting essential services.’

Within its three-year lifespan, the commission reported $424 billion in savings, including waste, fraud, abuse, over payments to government vendors and billions in unpaid taxes.

Reagan, however, faced the same resistance from the proverbial ‘Swamp’ in trying to implement the commission’s findings.

‘We’re not trying to hurt anyone. But the American taxpayer is being ripped off,’ Grace said at the time.

While ushered in as a conservative pragmatist, Reagan’s later years saw budget deficits grow, and the national debt more than double. The Dow also lost nearly one-quarter of its value on ‘Black Monday,’ Oct. 19, 1987.

The other contemporary president known for trying to ‘DOGE’ government was Texas Democrat Lyndon Johnson. LBJ was known for rapidly expanding government through his ‘Great Society’ social programs but also took aim at streamlining the Pentagon and Defense apparatus.

Efforts at the Pentagon largely failed, as the ongoing Vietnam War also accentuated costly balance sheets.

Defense Secretary Robert McNamara, a Kennedy holdover and former Ford Motor Company chief, was employed to make changes at the Pentagon.

He instituted what was called the Planning Programming Budgeting System, which sought to bring a more streamlined approach to managing the Pentagon’s budget.

However, the vast size of the defense bureaucracy – along with resistance from some military leaders – undermined the effectiveness of Johnson’s and McNamara’s reform efforts.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

previous post
Lithium Universe LtdSpodumene Offtake Update
next post
Fetterman, McCormick react to ‘astonishing’ Boulder attack on pro-Israel group: ‘Rank antisemitism’

You may also like

On dodging the media, Kamala Harris ‘owes responses’...

August 27, 2024

Trump team dismisses reports he will discharge trans...

November 30, 2024

Trump’s approach to Africa lauded by top Republican...

June 18, 2025

President Trump slams Rosie O’Donnell after she flees...

March 13, 2025

Schumer accuses Trump of exploiting Charlie Kirk’s death...

September 18, 2025

White House plans ‘extraordinary’ Holy Week as Trump...

April 13, 2025

Sen. Tim Scott outlines first 100 days of...

April 12, 2025

Trump announces picks for Army secretary, trade adviser,...

December 5, 2024

GOP senator blasts Schumer, Dems as ‘forcing’ shutdown...

September 24, 2025

Trump makes appearances at several Inaugural Balls around...

January 21, 2025

Recent Posts

  • Reporter’s Notebook : A ‘letter’ to Zelenskyy about the peace plan
  • JFK’s granddaughter, Tatiana Schlossberg, reveals terminal cancer diagnosis in heartbreaking essay
  • Obama wanted shutdown pain to be felt by Americans, while Trump kept focus on Washington, experts argue
  • Trump admin disputes claim that Ukraine peace plan was Russia ‘wish list’
  • Trump orders Epstein files release, welcomes Mamdani, crown prince to White House in busy week

    Sign up for our newsletter to receive the latest insights, updates, and exclusive content straight to your inbox! Whether it's industry news, expert advice, or inspiring stories, we bring you valuable information that you won't find anywhere else. Stay connected with us!


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Categories

    • Business (954)
    • Investing (3,490)
    • Politics (4,261)
    • Stock (4)
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: sightfulinvest.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 Sightful Invest. All Rights Reserved.