Sightful Invest
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Stock
Top Posts
Democrats project doom and gloom, not celebration, with...
Iran still wants a nuclear weapon despite ‘serious...
BTV Highlights: North American Iron, West Red Lake...
Tech 5: US Lifts EDA Restrictions for China,...
Xi Jinping’s surprise no-show at BRICS Summit fuels...
CoTec Holdings Corp. Announces Second Closing of Life...
Hempalta Secures 90-Day FCC Forbearance Extension as Company...
BTV Highlights: North American Iron, West Red Lake...
Crypto Market Recap: Crypto Rallies As “Big, Beautiful...
Quimbaya Gold Closes $4 Million Financing and Expands...
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Stock

Sightful Invest

Politics

Biden-appointed judge thwarts Trump’s attempt to clean house at consumer safety agency

by admin June 14, 2025
June 14, 2025
Biden-appointed judge thwarts Trump’s attempt to clean house at consumer safety agency

A federal judge in Maryland on Friday ruled that President Donald Trump lacked the authority to fire three Democratic members of the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) and ordered their reinstatement — teeing up another high-stakes court clash centered on Trump’s ability as commander-in-chief to remove or otherwise control the members of independent agencies.

U.S. District Judge Matthew Maddox, a Biden appointee, sided with the three ousted members of the board — Mary Boyle, Alexander Hoehn-Saric and Richard Trumka Jr. — in ruling that their firings were unlawful and ordered all three members to be reinstated to their posts.

In his ruling, Maddox said that the tenured design and protection of the five-member, staggered-term CPSC board does ‘not interfere with’ Trump’s executive branch powers under Article II of the U.S. Constitution.

The decision is a near-term blow for Trump, and comes just weeks after the Supreme Court last month agreed to uphold, for now, Trump’s removal of two Democratic appointees from the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and the Merit Systems Protections Board (MSPB). 

Both board members had challenged their terminations as ‘unlawful’ in separate lawsuits filed in D.C. federal court. The Supreme Court voted 6-3 in May to temporarily allow the firing of both board members, siding with lawyers for the Trump administration, who had urged the justices to keep both members on the job while the case continued to move through the lower courts.

In his ruling, Maddox sought to distinguish those cases from the terminations of members of the CPSC board and said that the Trump administration, in this case, had failed to identify neglect or malfeasance by any other Senate-confirmed commissioners on the CPSC, which is required by law to justify their removals. 

‘For the reasons set forth below, the Court finds no constitutional defect in the statutory restriction on Plaintiffs’ removal and that Plaintiffs’ purported removal from office was unlawful,’ he said in the order.

‘The Court shall enter an Order granting Plaintiffs’ motion, denying Defendants’ motion, and providing declaratory and injunctive relief permitting Plaintiffs to resume their duties as CPSC Commissioners.’

The decision clears the way for the members to return to their roles on the board, pending an appeal to higher courts by the Trump administration. 

The case is the latest in a string of challenges centered on Trump’s ability to remove members of independent boards. Like the NLRB and MSPB rulings, it centers on the 90-year-old Supreme Court decision known as Humphrey’s Executor, in which the court unanimously ruled that presidents cannot fire independent board members without cause.

Maddox invoked the uncertainty created by the preliminary posture of the NLRB and MSPB cases, which saw both plaintiffs removed and reinstated to their positions multiple times — which he said was the basis for ordering more permanent injunctive relief.

‘Disruption might have resulted in the instant case if Plaintiffs had been reinstated while this case was in its preliminary posture, only to have the Court later deny relief in its final judgment and subject Plaintiffs to removal again,’ said Maddox. ‘The risk of such disruption is no longer a factor now that the Court is granting permanent injunctive relief as a final judgment.’ 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

previous post
‘All-in’: GOP lawmakers divided on US involvement as Trump pushes Iran for diplomatic end
next post
Israel’s drone strikes in Iran show why US must halt China’s land grab here: experts

You may also like

JD Vance champions ‘roadmap’ toward US-India trade deal,...

April 22, 2025

With 3 days until voting starts, ‘election season’...

September 3, 2024

With 7 days until voting starts, ‘election season’...

August 30, 2024

Slain Hamas hostage’s family fights for the release...

April 9, 2025

Turkey’s invasion threats should be taken ‘very seriously’:...

August 11, 2024

HHS employees offered $25K as ‘incentive to voluntarily...

March 10, 2025

FBI investigating classified docs leak of US intel...

October 22, 2024

Top NATO military official urges businesses to be...

November 26, 2024

Speaker Johnson reaches tentative deal with blue state...

May 21, 2025

Constitution Party nominee aiming to help Trump, ‘destroy’...

August 22, 2024

Recent Posts

  • Democrats project doom and gloom, not celebration, with July 4 messages
  • Iran still wants a nuclear weapon despite ‘serious damage’ from US, Israeli strikes: expert warns
  • BTV Highlights: North American Iron, West Red Lake Gold Mines, Northisle Copper and Gold, Westport Fuels, US Gold, Orvana Minerals, Avino Silver & Gold, Pasofino Gold, & Mayfair Gold
  • Tech 5: US Lifts EDA Restrictions for China, Apple Explores Third Party AI for Siri
  • Xi Jinping’s surprise no-show at BRICS Summit fuels speculation about China’s global standing

    Become a VIP member by signing up for our newsletter. Enjoy exclusive content, early access to sales, and special offers just for you! As a VIP, you'll receive personalized updates, loyalty rewards, and invitations to private events. Elevate your experience and join our exclusive community today!


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Categories

    • Business (815)
    • Investing (2,464)
    • Politics (3,063)
    • Stock (4)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: sightfulinvest.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2024 Sightful Invest. All Rights Reserved.