Sightful Invest
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Stock
Top Posts
Thomas Massie introduces bill to pull US out...
JOHN YOO: Supreme Court showdown exposes shaky case...
South Korean K-pop stars BTS hit the right...
Nancy Mace vows to ‘fight like hell’ to...
DOJ cleared to release secret Jeffrey Epstein case...
Democrat John Fetterman decries ‘dehumanizing’ attack against Charlie...
US Chamber of Commerce accused of leading ‘woke...
Judge blocks Trump National Guard deployment in Los...
Lavrov warns Europe of retaliation as Zelenskyy opens...
Senate GOP barrels past blockade to advance nearly...
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Stock

Sightful Invest

Politics

Supreme Court hands Ed Sheeran legal win in Marvin Gaye copyright fight

by admin June 17, 2025
June 17, 2025
Supreme Court hands Ed Sheeran legal win in Marvin Gaye copyright fight

The Supreme Court has rejected a copyright lawsuit alleging that Ed Sheeran’s 2014 hit song ‘Thinking Out Loud’ copied music chords from Marvin Gaye’s 1973 classic ‘Let’s Get It On.’

The Supreme Court on Monday decided not to hear the case brought by Structured Asset Sales (SAS), which owns a portion of the rights to Gaye’s song. The decision keeps in place the lower court decision that Sheeran was not liable in the copyright infringement lawsuit.

SAS, which is owned by investment banker David Pullman, had argued that Sheeran used the copyrighted melody, harmony and rhythm of Gaye’s ‘Let’s Get It On.’

The case was dismissed in 2023 after U.S. District Judge Louis Stanton decided that the musical elements Sheeran was accused of copying were too common. 

The dismissal followed Sheeran’s victory in a separate copyright lawsuit over the song that was brought by the family of singer-songwriter Ed Townsend, who co-wrote Gaye’s song. 

‘It’s devastating to be accused of stealing someone else’s song when we’ve put so much work into our livelihoods,’ Sheeran said outside the courthouse following that verdict.

SAS appealed Stanton’s decision, though the New York-based 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the judge’s decision last year.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

previous post
Trump says Iran would ‘like to talk’ about dialing down Israel-Iran conflict
next post
Kraft Heinz to remove artificial dyes from U.S. products by end of 2027

You may also like

Dem claims Trump wielding nuclear strike authority ‘should...

December 13, 2024

Trump warns of jail time for Tesla vandals,...

March 21, 2025

Healthy living, party unity, and ‘time to smell...

January 1, 2025

Nikki Haley breaks with Trump on IVF proposal,...

September 9, 2024

This drone detection technology could have intercepted assassin’s...

July 26, 2024

Rubio just got an additional job in Trump’s...

May 9, 2025

Harris takes aim at Trump as she vows...

August 23, 2024

‘Blatantly unconstitutional’: US judge temporarily blocks Trump’s ban...

January 24, 2025

Elon Musk’s budget-slashing hits political reality of suffering...

February 19, 2025

Trump promises to ramp up energy production, lower...

March 5, 2025

Recent Posts

  • Thomas Massie introduces bill to pull US out of NATO: ‘America should not be the world’s security blanket’
  • JOHN YOO: Supreme Court showdown exposes shaky case against birthright citizenship
  • South Korean K-pop stars BTS hit the right note of how to wield cultural power
  • Nancy Mace vows to ‘fight like hell’ to rename old Black Lives Matter Plaza for Charlie Kirk
  • DOJ cleared to release secret Jeffrey Epstein case grand jury materials

    Sign up for our newsletter to receive the latest insights, updates, and exclusive content straight to your inbox! Whether it's industry news, expert advice, or inspiring stories, we bring you valuable information that you won't find anywhere else. Stay connected with us!


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Categories

    • Business (963)
    • Investing (3,628)
    • Politics (4,387)
    • Stock (4)
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: sightfulinvest.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 Sightful Invest. All Rights Reserved.