Sightful Invest
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Stock
Top Posts
Bernie Sanders crashes Schumer news conference, criticizes Democratic...
Bill Gates discovers the way to fight climate...
House conservatives back new funding deal to end...
Federal judge hits DOJ for ‘indict first, investigate...
Democrats see mandate after 2025 wins — Republicans...
Mike Johnson undercuts John Thune on Obamacare negotiations...
Russia drawing up plans to conduct nuclear tests...
Kazakhstan joining Abraham Accords, US official confirms
DOJ actively preparing to issue grand jury subpoenas...
Mike Johnson shoots down Obamacare vote guarantee after...
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Stock

Sightful Invest

Politics

House conservatives back new funding deal to end shutdown, reject ‘wasteful’ Obamacare subsidies

by admin November 6, 2025
November 6, 2025
House conservatives back new funding deal to end shutdown, reject ‘wasteful’ Obamacare subsidies

Leaders of a 189-member group that acts as the House GOP’s de facto conservative think tank are formally endorsing a new short-term federal funding bill.

With just over two weeks until the deadline for Republicans’ initial Nov. 21 plan and the threat of more government shutdown chaos, the Republican Study Committee (RSC) Steering Committee is calling for an extension into ‘at least’ January 2026.

‘Democrats are responsible for the longest government shutdown in U.S. history — paralyzing our country and deepening the healthcare crisis sparked by Obamacare,’ reads a statement first obtained by Fox News Digital.

‘House conservatives support a return to regular order accomplished only by a continuing resolution that funds the government at least into January 2026.’

A debate is already brewing within the GOP about how long another extension should last, with some conservatives even demanding a bill carrying last year’s federal spending levels through at least November 2026.

The House passed a short-term measure called a continuing resolution (CR) on Sept. 19, aimed at extending fiscal year (FY) 2025 funding levels for seven weeks to give lawmakers more time to strike a deal on FY 2026 federal spending.

But progress has been stalled in the Senate for weeks, where Democrats are demanding any spending bill be paired with an extension of COVID-19 pandemic-era Obamacare subsidies set to expire at the end of this year.

Senate Majority Leader Thune, R-S.D., has floated the idea of holding a vote on extending the subsidies if Democrats agree to Republicans’ CR, which is currently free of partisan policy riders.

It’s not clear if there’s an appetite for such a vote in the House, RSC leaders’ new statement suggests.

‘We are also committed to delivering a healthcare system that is truly accessible, affordable, and spurs innovation. Congress should reject any extension of the wasteful COVID-era subsidies that fuel fraud and drive up costs,’ they said.

The latest position by the RSC, led by Rep. August Pfluger, R-Texas, is likely an accurate indication of where most House Republicans’ feelings on both the CR and the Obamacare subsidies are.

Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., signaled support for a January CR on a private call with House GOP lawmakers on Tuesday, Fox News Digital was told earlier this week.

House Appropriations Committee Chairman Tom Cole, R-Okla., told Fox News Digital last month that he and others on his committee could support an extension into January.

But both issues are likely to see debate within the House GOP, not to mention the chamber as a whole.

Just over a dozen Republicans led by Rep. Jen Kiggans, R-Va., are supportive of extending the enhanced Obamacare subsidies by a year as a cushion to give the GOP more time to reform the flawed U.S. healthcare system.

Without it, some members of that coalition have argued, millions of Americans could be faced with a fiscal cliff leaving them to pay significantly more per month for their healthcare.

And on the CR debate, the House Freedom Caucus led by Rep. Andy Harris, R-Md., recently released a statement calling for a CR that extends at least into November 2026.

Their reasoning is that such a measure is the most effective way of keeping federal spending low and avoids another messy government funding fight until after the midterm elections.

But appropriators are against such a move, arguing that Congress must follow its constitutional duty in setting a yearly budget rather than relying on spending levels first passed under former President Joe Biden for another year.

It’s also not clear that Democrats, at least several of whom are needed to break a filibuster in the Senate, would accept a year-long CR.

Meanwhile, the government shutdown is in its 37th day, already having made history as the longest fiscal standoff in U.S. history.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

previous post
Federal judge hits DOJ for ‘indict first, investigate later’ approach in court hearing
next post
Bill Gates discovers the way to fight climate battle actually involves helping humans

You may also like

House Freedom Caucus conservative to enter race for...

July 26, 2025

House balance of power still undecided a week...

November 12, 2024

Federal judge orders Trump admin to restore public...

February 12, 2025

The Hitchhiker’s Guide to failing to elect a...

December 27, 2024

Republican Erik Olsen to face off against Democrat...

August 14, 2024

Bolton may be in hot water as FBI...

August 27, 2025

Netanyahu broadcasts United Nations message into Gaza accusing...

September 26, 2025

Trump picks Dr. Marty Makary as Food and...

November 23, 2024

‘Louder by the hour’: Senate GOP wants the...

July 25, 2025

American Bar Association blasts Bondi’s decision to block...

June 12, 2025

Recent Posts

  • Bernie Sanders crashes Schumer news conference, criticizes Democratic Party leadership
  • Bill Gates discovers the way to fight climate battle actually involves helping humans
  • House conservatives back new funding deal to end shutdown, reject ‘wasteful’ Obamacare subsidies
  • Federal judge hits DOJ for ‘indict first, investigate later’ approach in court hearing
  • Democrats see mandate after 2025 wins — Republicans say it’s a mirage

    Sign up for our newsletter to receive the latest insights, updates, and exclusive content straight to your inbox! Whether it's industry news, expert advice, or inspiring stories, we bring you valuable information that you won't find anywhere else. Stay connected with us!


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Categories

    • Business (948)
    • Investing (3,365)
    • Politics (4,115)
    • Stock (4)
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: sightfulinvest.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 Sightful Invest. All Rights Reserved.