Sightful Invest
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Stock
Top Posts
James Comer to accuse Tim Walz of being...
Expired Obamacare subsidy deal inches toward Senate floor...
JONATHAN TURLEY: Impeachment obsession returns as Democrats recycle...
Rep LaMalfa’s death further shrinks Republican House majority
China bans military-use exports to key US ally...
From sanctions to seizure: What Maduro’s capture means...
Scathing audit reveals more fraud concerns inside top...
Emmer warns Walz could end up ‘in cuffs’...
Trump admin’s new nutrition guidelines target ultra-processed foods,...
Graham warns Iranian ayatollah: ‘Trump is gonna kill...
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Stock

Sightful Invest

Politics

Trump admin fights in court to keep White House East Wing demolition, $300M ballroom build on track

by admin December 16, 2025
December 16, 2025
Trump admin fights in court to keep White House East Wing demolition, $300M ballroom build on track

Lawyers for the Trump administration and a historic preservation group are slated to appear in court Tuesday afternoon in a bid to halt — at least temporarily — President Donald Trump’s plan to continue building out a $300 million White House ballroom on the site of the now-demolished East Wing. 

‘No president is legally allowed to tear down portions of the White House without any review whatsoever — not President Trump, not President Biden, and not anyone else,’ the National Trust said in its lawsuit, filed late last week with U.S. District Judge Richard Leon.

The group argued that Trump’s project has already caused ‘irreversible damage’ to the White House, and asked Leon to grant both a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction to block the Trump administration from commencing or continuing further work on the ballroom project until the necessary federal commissions have reviewed and approved the plans.

The suit alleges violations of multiple statutes, including the Administrative Procedure Act and the National Environmental Policy Act, and says the ballroom cannot move forward without authorization from Congress, the National Capital Planning Commission and the Commission of Fine Arts. Trump fired all six members of the CFA in October; the panel remains vacant.

Meanwhile, lawyers for the Justice Department argued in a separate filing on Monday that Trump does have the statutory authority to modify the structure as president.

‘The President possesses statutory authority to modify the structure of his residence, and that authority is supported by background principles of Executive power,’ the Justice Department told the court on Monday in a separate filing. 

They cited Trump’s personal involvement in the project, and noted that he has regularly taken part in meetings and discussions ‘regarding design and footprint and personally selecting the architect for the project,’ among other things. 

Lawyers for the Trump administration also argued that abruptly halting construction on the project would create ‘security concerns’ at the White House, an argument it is expected to seize on further during Tuesday afternoon’s hearing. 

They also included a declaration from Secret Service deputy director Matthew Quinn that said improvements to the site ‘are still needed before the Secret Service’s safety and security requirements can be met.’

‘Any pause in construction, even temporarily, would leave the contractor’s obligation unfulfilled in this regard and consequently hamper the Secret Service’s ability to meet its statutory obligations and protective mission.’

Trump in July first announced his plans to proceed with constructing the sprawling, 90,000-square-foot ballroom, which he estimated at the time would cost around $200 million. Trump has insisted it will be funded ‘100% by me and some friends of mine.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

previous post
JD Vance brushes off Susie Wiles calling him conspiracy theorist in new Vanity Fair report
next post
Kennedy urges GOP to restart spending battle amid soaring cost of living, warns against wasting majority

You may also like

‘Instincts for restraint’: Senate divided over who gets...

June 19, 2025

Federal judge strikes down Biden-era transgender regulation

October 24, 2025

Trump backs Huckabee Sanders and a bunch of...

November 4, 2025

Here’s the pathway for President Trump to receive...

August 29, 2025

Trump touts administration’s progress on peace deals, says...

June 28, 2025

Venezuelan military jets buzz US Navy ship in...

September 5, 2025

Putin backs Trump’s claim that the Ukraine war...

August 16, 2025

‘No reason’ for new nukes: Trump floats disarmament...

February 14, 2025

Trump brushes back Russia’s Medvedev after ‘war’ warning:...

July 31, 2025

Here is who is vying for power in...

December 10, 2024

Recent Posts

  • James Comer to accuse Tim Walz of being ‘asleep at the wheel’ at fraud hearing
  • Expired Obamacare subsidy deal inches toward Senate floor vote amid bipartisan talks
  • JONATHAN TURLEY: Impeachment obsession returns as Democrats recycle lawfare to fire up their base
  • Rep LaMalfa’s death further shrinks Republican House majority
  • China bans military-use exports to key US ally as Taiwan tensions rise

    Sign up for our newsletter to receive the latest insights, updates, and exclusive content straight to your inbox! Whether it's industry news, expert advice, or inspiring stories, we bring you valuable information that you won't find anywhere else. Stay connected with us!


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Categories

    • Business (964)
    • Investing (3,814)
    • Politics (4,611)
    • Stock (4)
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: sightfulinvest.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2026 Sightful Invest. All Rights Reserved.