Sightful Invest
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Stock
Top Posts
State Department report condemns South Africa over ‘extrajudicial...
Climate group scrubs judges’ names from website after...
Israeli NGO works behind the scenes to coordinate...
Venezuela human rights hit new low as US...
Feds unseal charges against ‘Barbecue,’ Haitian gang leader...
Ashley Biden files for divorce from husband, Howard...
More than 20 GOP attorneys general call on...
Former Navy SEAL Rep. Eli Crane fires off...
House Democrat presses DOJ on Ghislaine Maxwell prison...
Vance to visit US troops during high-stakes UK...
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Stock

Sightful Invest

Politics

10 Dems vote with GOP to rebuke Biden officials over chaotic Afghanistan withdrawal

by admin September 26, 2024
September 26, 2024
10 Dems vote with GOP to rebuke Biden officials over chaotic Afghanistan withdrawal

Ten Democrats voted with Republicans to rebuke Biden administration officials over their handling of the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan on Wednesday.

It passed 219 to 194, and among the Democrats who voted for the measure are Reps. Jared Golden, D-Maine; Mary Peltola, D-Alaska; Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, D-Wash.; Vicente Gonzalez, D-Texas; Greg Landsman, D-Ohio; and Jeff Jackson, D-N.C.

The bill was introduced by House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Michael McCaul, R-Texas, who conducted a yearslong investigation into the chaotic military operation.

‘Three years after the deadly and chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan, the Biden-Harris administration has yet to hold anyone accountable for one of the most devastating foreign policy blunders in American history,’ McCaul told Fox News Digital.

He accused Biden officials of having ‘prioritized optics over security,’ which McCaul said led to the deaths of the 13 U.S. servicemembers who were killed in a terror attack at Hamid Karzai International Airport in Kabul during the withdrawal.

McCaul read their names on the House floor in closing remarks for debate on the bill.

‘Nothing will bring their lives back,’ he said.

The resolution specifically name-checks 15 current or former Biden administration members, including President Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris, Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, former White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki, former Ambassador to Afghanistan Ross Wilson, and Secretary of State Antony Blinken, among others.

Leading opposition to McCaul’s bill was Rep. Gregory Meeks, D-N.Y., the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee.

‘This resolution, as I’ve said all along, is nothing more than political theater designed to score cheap points rather than address the real issues at hand,’ Meeks said. ‘It’s a distortion of the facts and a disservice to the American people, a disservice to our servicemembers, a disservice to our diplomats – all of who put their lives on the line during our 20-year war efforts.’

Them and their sacrifices should not be used as a political football. We should be working on real solutions, supporting our Afghan allies, ensuring that we learn the right lessons, and providing accountability that are based on truth, not partisan narratives.’

McCaul responded, ‘I have tremendous respect [for Meeks]. We work together on many things, bipartisan. And when we don’t agree, we do so civilly. However, I cannot disagree with you more than I do today.’

‘Who could ever forget the harrowing images of Afghans falling off the planes, and babies being flung over barbed wire in a desperate attempt by mothers to save their children and escape Afghanistan under Taliban rule?’ he asked.

McCaul is also poised to lead the House in holding Blinken in contempt of Congress over accusations he is stonewalling his probe. 

His committee advanced that resolution on Tuesday, and Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., suggested to Fox News Digital that he will bring it up for a House-wide vote when lawmakers return from a six-week recess that starts Wednesday.

State Department spokesman Matthew Miller criticized the move in a Tuesday statement, ‘Today’s action by the House Committee on Foreign Affairs was a naked political exercise masquerading as oversight, designed only to further the majority’s partisan interests under the guise of asking questions that have long ago been answered.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

previous post
Forward Water Technologies Corp. Announces Share Consolidation Effective Date
next post
DAVID MARCUS: 5 reasons Kamala Harris is snubbing the Al Smith Dinner, Catholics, and tradition

You may also like

Trump, Congress looking to put suffocating sanctions on...

November 26, 2024

‘Definitely worth it’: Trump supporters share their inauguration...

January 21, 2025

Trump begins endorsing replacements to replenish GOP majority...

November 26, 2024

TikTok makes its case to skeptical justices: ‘No...

January 11, 2025

Republicans to huddle behind closed doors to elect...

November 13, 2024

‘I’ve never seen this’: Top Republican details level of Secret...

September 19, 2024

Harris edges closer to Trump in new poll...

July 26, 2024

Dems dig in, Trump demands all: Nominee fight...

August 3, 2025

Senate confirms Doug Burgum to lead the Department...

January 31, 2025

‘Waste less, save more’: DOGE caucus member rolls...

January 14, 2025

Recent Posts

  • State Department report condemns South Africa over ‘extrajudicial killings’ in annual human rights report
  • Climate group scrubs judges’ names from website after unearthed chats unmasked cozy ties
  • Israeli NGO works behind the scenes to coordinate aid to Gazan civilians
  • Venezuela human rights hit new low as US puts $50M bounty on Maduro’s head: State Department
  • Feds unseal charges against ‘Barbecue,’ Haitian gang leader with $5M bounty on his head

    Become a VIP member by signing up for our newsletter. Enjoy exclusive content, early access to sales, and special offers just for you! As a VIP, you'll receive personalized updates, loyalty rewards, and invitations to private events. Elevate your experience and join our exclusive community today!


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Categories

    • Business (869)
    • Investing (2,737)
    • Politics (3,379)
    • Stock (4)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: sightfulinvest.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2024 Sightful Invest. All Rights Reserved.