Sightful Invest
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Stock
Top Posts
Dueling Obamacare plans set to fail as deadline...
Trump declares support for Cabinet official after report...
Kristi Noem faces first major Homeland Security grilling...
GOP accuses Democrats of manufacturing affordability crisis as...
DAVID MARCUS: Minnesota’s botched legal weed rollout reeks...
Trump presses Thune to ‘get something done’ on...
Senate Dems block Republicans’ HSA plan as Obamacare...
Dem rep opens House hearing by telling Noem...
23 Dems join House Republicans to kill progressive’s...
Senate Dems’ Obamacare fix fails as Senate looks...
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Stock

Sightful Invest

Politics

‘Polarizing’ way of picking party nominees targeted in ballot questions in these 6 states

by admin October 23, 2024
October 23, 2024
‘Polarizing’ way of picking party nominees targeted in ballot questions in these 6 states

A ballot initiative to implement open primary voting across six states is gaining momentum, according to advocates of the proposal who say it will eliminate ‘polarizing’ and ‘extreme’ candidates from making it onto the ballot, allowing a more diverse group of candidates to represent voters.

Proponents hope this year’s success is indicative of future changes to U.S. elections.

Colorado, Arizona, Idaho, South Dakota, Montana and Nevada qualified for an open primary initiative for the 2024 ballot, Unite America – a philanthropic venture fund – found. Other states across the country already have an open primary system, including Alaska, Texas, Minnesota, Wisconsin and Virginia, among others.

Research from the Unite America Institute reveals that just 8% of voters elected 83% of the U.S. House of Representatives in 2022. In 2024, 7% have already elected 84%. Unite America attributed this ‘primary problem’ to the polarization and gridlock hindering Congress and state legislatures from addressing key issues important to voters that often go unnoticed come election season.

Nick Troiano, executive director of Unite America, told Fox News Digital that an open primary system ‘would literally enfranchise millions of Americans closed out, and that includes independents.’

In an open primary system, voters can choose which party’s primary to participate in, regardless of their own party affiliation. This allows registered voters, including independents, to vote in any party’s primary, promoting broader participation.

By contrast, a closed primary system requires voters to be registered with a specific party to vote in that party’s primary. This approach ensures that only party members can influence the selection of their candidates, often leading to more ideologically consistent nominees but potentially excluding independent voters from the process.

‘So this gives voters a lot more freedom to vote for whom they want, you know, regardless of party. And that’s the belief at the end of the day is that our election system should serve voters, not parties as private organizations,’ Troiano told Fox News Digital.

Another advocate of the open primary system is former Colorado Congressman Ken Buck. Buck, who retired as a representative earlier this year to work behind-the-scenes on election reform projects, said that many American voters are currently frustrated with their presidential choices. 

He noted that recent election reforms in various states are primarily focused on Senate and gubernatorial races, rather than the presidential election. This discontent may create an opportunity for meaningful reform in the electoral system, he said.

‘AOC beat a member of leadership in the Democratic primary, and she did it again with a very small percentage,’ Buck, who endorsed the open primary ballot inititative in his state, told Fox News Digital. ‘It’s like 12% of the overall registered voters in the in her district, voted for her in that primary, and then, because it’s a blue district, she becomes the member. That’s the example.’

Buck believes that these changes could lead to higher-quality candidates, as current primary systems often allow candidates to win with a small percentage of the vote—sometimes as low as 38%—due to a crowded field. He suggested that such candidates often lack broad support among voters and may prioritize social media appeal over addressing the pressing issues facing constituents. 

Buck and Troiano said so far, typically the party that is most in control of the state are opposed to the ballot measure.

‘So in Nevada, the Democratic Party, and Idaho, it’s the Republican Party,’ Troiano said. ‘But we make the case that this is good for voters today and is good for democracy.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

previous post
Elon Musk blasts Tim Walz after Democrat trains fire on the Trump-backing tycoon
next post
Harris campaign plagued by surrogates’ gaffes: ‘Colossally inept campaign’

You may also like

Government shutdown drags into weekend as Senate Democrats...

October 4, 2025

Speaker Johnson moves on Senate’s Trump budget bill...

April 6, 2025

NASA’s ‘quiet’ supersonic jet completes first flight in...

October 29, 2025

With 9 days until voting starts, ‘election season’...

August 28, 2024

GOP-led Senate confirming president’s nominees at faster pace...

February 5, 2025

China’s AI innovation is ‘accelerating’ but US remains...

April 9, 2025

UK lawmakers vote in favor of bill legalizing...

November 30, 2024

Trump unleashes US nuclear renaissance with bold executive...

May 24, 2025

GOP rep who hasn’t voted in months living...

December 23, 2024

Zuckerberg, expressing regrets, admits bowing to Biden administration...

August 28, 2024

Recent Posts

  • Dueling Obamacare plans set to fail as deadline nears, pushing Senate toward bipartisan talks
  • Trump declares support for Cabinet official after report he is considering replacement
  • Kristi Noem faces first major Homeland Security grilling as lawmakers press her on terror threats
  • GOP accuses Democrats of manufacturing affordability crisis as Obamacare subsidy fight nears deadline
  • DAVID MARCUS: Minnesota’s botched legal weed rollout reeks of DEI, corruption and Tim Walz

    Sign up for our newsletter to receive the latest insights, updates, and exclusive content straight to your inbox! Whether it's industry news, expert advice, or inspiring stories, we bring you valuable information that you won't find anywhere else. Stay connected with us!


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Categories

    • Business (963)
    • Investing (3,638)
    • Politics (4,397)
    • Stock (4)
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: sightfulinvest.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 Sightful Invest. All Rights Reserved.